not a sug. - more of a prob - diff rule sets

santa c · Post by **santa c** » Thu Dec 04, 2003 12:09 pm

well - problems, concernning, some rules, sets, get wierd ratings - i dunno, what to say - my EXTREAMLY easy 3484,3485 problems, got scary difficuly levels - well - it's a bit early to jusgde, but a looot of ppl, don't know the basics, of the NZ rules set, so, alooot of ppl mistakken on more than simple things - things as simple as putting a stone in the middle of 3 spaces to kill..

{Posted by santa c}

unkx80 · Post by **unkx80** » Mon Dec 29, 2003 12:03 am

As if we don't already have enough rule sets. The subtle differences in the various rule sets can be really confusing.

{Posted by unkx80}

santa c · Post by **santa c** » Mon Dec 29, 2003 5:16 am

so ur against having probs with any other rule sets but the jp one? i don't think it's such a good idea... - since nobody said that problems should be limited to it... and by ignoring probs it'd be vs the sites idea. as i c it, at least..

{Posted by santa c}

rubilia · Post by **rubilia** » Wed Apr 07, 2004 8:01 am

I am strongly interested in chinese endgame issues (using area scoring) and superko problems. Although in western countries Japanese rules are very popular, chinese-like rulesets are the most used ones in the world. We shouldn´t ignore them. I don´t see any danger to the players being interested in (or accustomed to, respectively) Japanese rules only. Furthermore, I don´t expect anyone to create new rulesets by providing problems at goproblems.com.

{Posted by rubilia}